Mormonism and Original Sin
Morrmons often pride themselves on the rejection of the Catholic/Christian
doctrine of “original sin.” We think that in rejecting the idea that all men
are born into sin because of Adam’s transgression, we focus on the innocence of
new life. A wealth of other Mormon doctrines stem from the rejection of
original sin, including the idea that children don’t need to be baptized until
the age of eight, which we deem the “age of accountability” and even the idea
that special needs children who never reach a mental age of accountability are
automatically accepted into the celestial kingdom upon death. I spent most of
my life holding fast to the importance of the idea of original innocence. But a
few years ago, I began to question it.
A few years ago, I was recovering from a deep faith crisis
and returning to God. At the same time, I was also experiencing a creative
crisis. The career I had built as a young adult fantasy author had crumbled. My
big publisher dreams died as my sales tanked and it seemed I would never
publish under my own name again. My agent sat down with me at a conference and
told me he wished that somehow he could give me back my confidence of my early
years. I thought that was what I needed, too. But when we sat down together to
look at a list of book ideas, he pointed to “The Bishop’s Wife” and said, “Whatever
you do, don’t write that.” And I went home and wrote that book in a few weeks.
What I realized, looking back at the situation, was that it
was important for my agent to tell me not to do that thing in a way not
dissimilar to Adam and Eve’s commandment not to eat of the tree of good and evil.
Not because I was a contrarian, but because I needed to do a thing that was
just for me and not for anyone else. I needed to do something that would not
get me any approval because I needed to figure out who I still was, behind the
success and security of my author name. I needed to go back to the beginning,
before I had been “branded.” I needed to accept that I was probably going to be
bad, that the book I was writing was probably going to be unpublishable. And I
needed to do it anyway.
Does that sound at all like original sin? Well, to me it
does. It does because I think Mormons often see original sin as a burden, a
weight that keeps us from God. But my experience in talking with other
Christians about this important doctrine is that they see it as the opposite.
Original sin is freeing because it means that we can stop worrying about being
good. Of course we’re not going to be good. We’re not going to know what
divinity is like. We’re not going to be kind and loving all the time. How could
be possibly be like that? We’re human. We’re mortal. We’re messy and flawed.
And we need grace. So God provided it for us.
As a writer, giving up the idea that I was going to write
something publishable was freeing. My original sin was being a bad writer. And
embracing that was freeing. It wasn’t a weight. It was the opposite. It meant I
could try new things. I could fail. And it didn’t matter. No one was watching
me anymore. I was a nobody again. And that was a great gift. It’s the gift that
original sin gives me theologically.
Mormonism taught me that I was a good person inherently,
that I had the light of Christ in me, that I was born innocent. But the
doctrine of original sin teaches me that I am going to fail and fail often. I’m
going to hurt people, especially the people I love. It teaches me that God knew
I was going to do all this, and that’s why Christ was sent. I don’t have to
feel bad that I added to Christ’s suffering. My little tiny addition matters
nothing against the whole of humanity’s evil. I’m just a natural part of all of
that and I don’t need to feel embarrassed about it.
Original sin allows me to get over myself, to stop worrying
about being so bad. Because duh, who do you think you are? Better than other
people? No. You’re human. You’re mortal. You are part of this system that we
were all born into. There’s no getting out of it. It’s corrupt. It’s outside of
Eden. It’s what our parents chose for us, to live with the knowledge of good
and evil, but only after we see the consequences of having chosen this fruit or
that fruit.
The gift God gave us was telling us not to do that, so that
we could do it freely, and we could see what happened. We could be mortal and
flawed and full of sin. It is a gift, not a burden. It is freedom.
Comments
Post a Comment